As a developer tools analyst, I've compared Project A (onivim/oni2) and Project B (zedapp/zed) based on momentum, community size, and apparent use cases. Here's the analysis: Project A, onivim/oni2, boasts a significantly larger community with 7,860 stars on GitHub, supplemented by a steady influx of 5 new stars over the last 30 days. This indicates strong, sustained momentum and a broad user base. Its positioning as a native, lightweight modal code editor suggests it caters to developers seeking a minimalist, performant editing experience, likely appealing to fans of vim and those working on resource-constrained environments. In contrast, Project B, zedapp/zed, has a smaller but still notable community of 2,275 stars, with 4 new stars added in the last 30 days. This suggests a slower but still positive growth trajectory. Zed's mission to "rethink code editing" implies an emphasis on innovation and potentially attracting developers looking for a futuristic or experimental editing paradigm, possibly those interested in AI-assisted coding or novel UI interactions. While onivim/oni2's larger community and steady growth may offer more immediate support and stability, zedapp/zed's unique value proposition could appeal to innovators and early adopters seeking something beyond traditional editing experiences. The choice between the two may hinge on whether the priority is a proven, lightweight solution or the potential of a revolutionary editing approach.