Top Open Source Databases in 2026

Explore the leading open-source databases, evaluated by star growth, developer expertise, and user demographics. Insights from 37 repositories.

Open source databases have become a cornerstone of modern software development, offering flexibility, cost-efficiency, and a robust community-driven ecosystem. These databases cater to a wide array of use cases, from real-time analytics to vector search, and are increasingly favored by senior engineers and CTOs for their scalability and performance. Among the leading repositories in this space, DuckDB stands out for its in-process SQL database management system, designed to deliver high performance for analytical queries. Similarly, ClickHouse has gained traction for its real-time analytics capabilities, making it a go-to for applications requiring rapid data processing and querying. For those delving into the realm of AI and machine learning, Qdrant offers a high-performance vector database and search engine, tailored for the next generation of AI applications. These repositories, along with others like Milvus and PostgreSQL, represent the diversity and innovation within the open source database community. When evaluating tools in this category, developers should consider factors such as performance benchmarks, community support, and the specific use cases they aim to address, ensuring that the chosen database aligns with their project's requirements and long-term goals.

Total Repositories

37

Combined Stars

652.4K

HOT Repos

22

Fastest Growing

qdrant/qdrant

Repository Comparison

#RepositoryStarsMonthly GrowthTierCompare
1qdrant/qdrant34.3K581/moHOTCompare →
2duckdb/duckdb40.8K531/moHOTCompare →
3ClickHouse/ClickHouse49.6K523/moHOTCompare →
4milvus-io/milvus45.9K432/moHOTCompare →
5postgres/postgres21.9K343/moHOTCompare →
6elastic/elasticsearch77.9K244/moHOTCompare →
7vitessio/vitess21.3K158/moHOTCompare →
8MariaDB/server8.2K145/moHOTCompare →
9cockroachdb/cockroach32.4K139/moHOTCompare →
10pingcap/tidb40.5K127/moHOTCompare →
11apache/doris15.8K127/moHOTCompare →
12mongodb/mongo28.5K121/moHOTCompare →
13trinodb/trino13.2K118/moHOTCompare →
14StarRocks/starrocks12.1K104/moHOTCompare →
15citusdata/citus12.7K93/moHOTCompare →
16risingwavelabs/risingwave9.3K90/moHOTCompare →
17taosdata/TDengine25.1K78/moHOTCompare →
18apple/foundationdb16.7K72/moHOTCompare →
19tikv/tikv16.8K62/moHOTCompare →
20GreptimeTeam/greptimedb6.6K61/moHOTCompare →
21databendlabs/databend9.4K55/moHOTCompare →
22oceanbase/oceanbase10.3K53/moHOTCompare →
23FerretDB/FerretDB11.1K44/moWARMCompare →
24prestodb/presto16.7K33/moWARMCompare →
25apache/druid14.0K29/moWARMCompare →
26apache/hive6.0K24/moWARMCompare →
27apache/hbase5.6K17/moWARMCompare →
28yugabyte/yugabyte-db10.5K10/moWARMCompare →
29apache/ignite5.1K10/moWARMCompare →
30risinglightdb/risinglight1.8K9/moCOLDCompare →
31apache/cloudberry1.4K9/moCOLDCompare →
32apache/horaedb2.8K8/moCOLDCompare →
33percona/percona-server1.3K5/moCOLDCompare →
34apache/kylin3.8K3/moCOLDCompare →
35polardb/polardbx-sql1.7K2/moCOLDCompare →
36polardb/polardbx-engine5732/moCOLDCompare →
37apache/shardingsphere20.8K—FROZENCompare →

Developer Audience

Seniority, company, and location breakdown across 99,867 enriched stargazers.

Seniority

Mid / Senior Engineer75%
Founder / Co-founder8%
Intern / Junior8%
Lead / Manager6%
Director / CXO4%

Top Companies

Alibaba119
Freelance118
Microsoft110
Tencent109
Freelancer102
ByteDance66
Red Hat41
Google34

Top Locations

Beijing, China3,191
Shanghai, China2,404
China1,412
Hangzhou, China1,124
Shenzhen, China1,004
Berlin, Germany554
Paris, France508
Tokyo, Japan474

Head-to-Head Comparisons

polardb/polardbx-engine vs: