Top Open Source Databases in 2026

Explore the leading open-source databases, evaluated by star growth, developer expertise, and user demographics. Insights from 37 repositories.

Open source databases have become a cornerstone of modern software development, offering flexibility, cost-efficiency, and a robust community-driven ecosystem. These databases cater to a wide array of use cases, from real-time analytics to vector search, and are increasingly favored by senior engineers and CTOs for their scalability and performance. Among the leading repositories in this space, DuckDB stands out for its in-process SQL database management system, designed to deliver high performance for analytical queries. Similarly, ClickHouse has gained traction for its real-time analytics capabilities, making it a go-to for applications requiring rapid data processing and querying. For those delving into the realm of AI and machine learning, Qdrant offers a high-performance vector database and search engine, tailored for the next generation of AI applications. These repositories, along with others like Milvus and PostgreSQL, represent the diversity and innovation within the open source database community. When evaluating tools in this category, developers should consider factors such as performance benchmarks, community support, and the specific use cases they aim to address, ensuring that the chosen database aligns with their project's requirements and long-term goals.

Total Repositories

37

Combined Stars

645.3K

HOT Repos

22

Fastest Growing

qdrant/qdrant

Repository Comparison

#RepositoryStarsMonthly GrowthTierCompare
1qdrant/qdrant33.4K581/moHOTCompare
2duckdb/duckdb39.5K531/moHOTCompare
3ClickHouse/ClickHouse48.7K523/moHOTCompare
4milvus-io/milvus45.3K432/moHOTCompare
5postgres/postgres21.5K343/moHOTCompare
6elastic/elasticsearch77.5K244/moHOTCompare
7vitessio/vitess21.1K158/moHOTCompare
8MariaDB/server7.9K145/moHOTCompare
9cockroachdb/cockroach32.3K139/moHOTCompare
10pingcap/tidb40.3K127/moHOTCompare
11apache/doris15.6K127/moHOTCompare
12mongodb/mongo28.5K121/moHOTCompare
13trinodb/trino13.0K118/moHOTCompare
14StarRocks/starrocks11.9K104/moHOTCompare
15citusdata/citus12.6K93/moHOTCompare
16risingwavelabs/risingwave9.2K90/moHOTCompare
17taosdata/TDengine25.0K78/moHOTCompare
18apple/foundationdb16.5K72/moHOTCompare
19tikv/tikv16.8K62/moHOTCompare
20GreptimeTeam/greptimedb6.5K61/moHOTCompare
21databendlabs/databend9.4K55/moHOTCompare
22oceanbase/oceanbase10.2K53/moHOTCompare
23FerretDB/FerretDB11.0K44/moWARMCompare
24prestodb/presto16.7K33/moWARMCompare
25apache/druid14.0K29/moWARMCompare
26apache/hive6.0K24/moWARMCompare
27apache/hbase5.5K17/moWARMCompare
28yugabyte/yugabyte-db10.4K10/moWARMCompare
29apache/ignite5.1K10/moWARMCompare
30risinglightdb/risinglight1.8K9/moCOLDCompare
31apache/cloudberry1.2K9/moCOLDCompare
32apache/horaedb2.8K8/moCOLDCompare
33percona/percona-server1.3K5/moCOLDCompare
34apache/kylin3.8K3/moCOLDCompare
35polardb/polardbx-sql1.7K2/moCOLDCompare
36polardb/polardbx-engine5722/moCOLDCompare
37apache/shardingsphere20.8KFROZENCompare

Developer Audience

Seniority, company, and location breakdown across 61,295 enriched stargazers.

Seniority

Mid / Senior Engineer75%
Founder / Co-founder8%
Lead / Manager6%
Intern / Junior6%
Director / CXO4%

Top Companies

Freelance86
Microsoft71
Freelancer69
Alibaba66
Red Hat49
Tencent47
ByteDance27
@google16

Top Locations

Beijing, China2,052
Shanghai, China1,529
China863
Hangzhou, China622
Shenzhen, China564
Tokyo, Japan499
Berlin, Germany490
Paris, France427

Head-to-Head Comparisons

polardb/polardbx-engine vs: